Imported Upstream version 2.0

[pkg/t-prot.git] / ChangeLog

diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index cd3d928ad09f01eba61770ab14219a2b3d07afb9..d991c1d45a4cab193b169cd431cf03cc6f519d39 100644 (file)
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,118 @@
+2005-05-27 10:00  Jochen Striepe
+
+       * t-prot: Re-release as v2.0. No code change since v1.104.
+
+2005-05-13 00:06  Jochen Striepe
+
+       * t-prot.1: Matthias Kilian suggested some cleanup for better
+       reading. Many thanks!
+
+2005-05-12 15:29  Jochen Striepe
+
+       * t-prot.1: Include the BUGS file in the REPORTING BUGS section.
+
+2005-05-12 15:07  Jochen Striepe
+
+       * t-prot.1: Fix typo.
+
+2005-05-12 15:07  Jochen Striepe
+
+       * t-prot.1: Provide more information on how to submit bug reports.
+
+2005-05-12 03:32  Jochen Striepe
+
+       * t-prot.1: Fix formatting.
+
+2005-05-12 03:29  Jochen Striepe
+
+       * t-prot.1: Another typo.
+
+2005-05-12 03:27  Jochen Striepe
+
+       * t-prot.1: Fix typo.
+
+2005-05-12 02:54  Jochen Striepe
+
+       * t-prot: Release as v1.104.
+
+2005-05-11 12:14  Jochen Striepe
+
+       * t-prot.1: Many clarifications and added details. Some formatting
+       cleanup.
+
+2005-05-11 09:21  Jochen Striepe
+
+       * t-prot.1: Fix copyright date string.
+
+2005-05-11 09:17  Jochen Striepe
+
+       * t-prot.1: LICENSE CHANGE!
+       
+       Alfie is completely right: Since the copyright notice essentially
+       is a BSD license, it is the Right Thing to simply switch to a BSD
+       license (slightly modified, as there is no binary code in t-prot).
+
+2005-05-11 01:22  Jochen Striepe
+
+       * t-prot.1: LICENSE CHANGE! More clarifications. The meaning still
+       remains the same.
+
+2005-05-11 01:16  Jochen Striepe
+
+       * t-prot.1: LICENSE CHANGE! The meaning remains the same, but the
+       wording should be a little clearer now.
+
+2005-05-11 01:14  Jochen Striepe
+
+       * t-prot.1: Remove unnecessary text block.
+
+2005-05-11 01:09  Jochen Striepe
+
+       * t-prot: The case-sensitivity of the Content-Type: header (vs.
+       Content-type:) seems not to be absolutely clear. RFC 1049 should be
+       obsoleted by RFCs 2045-2049 by now, but to be sure, we will accept
+       both strings.
+
+2005-05-11 01:04  Jochen Striepe
+
+       * t-prot.1: RFC 822 is no longer important. RFC 2822 should
+       suffice.
+
+2005-05-11 00:59  Jochen Striepe
+
+       * t-prot.1: Update date string.
+
+2005-05-11 00:58  Jochen Striepe
+
+       * t-prot.1: Fix apostrophe.
+
+2005-05-10 13:09  Jochen Striepe
+
+       * contrib/t-prot.sl: Update copyright.
+
+2005-05-09 14:54  Jochen Striepe
+
+       * contrib/t-prot.sl: Make sure users get a hint if they look why
+       t-prot.sl does not work on their system (just as I did and wondered
+       what was wrong).
+
+2005-05-08 18:13  Jochen Striepe
+
+       * t-prot: Release as v1.103.
+
+2005-05-08 18:13  Jochen Striepe
+
+       * t-prot: More regex fixes.
+
+2005-05-08 17:50  Jochen Striepe
+
+       * t-prot: Release as v1.102.
+
+2005-05-08 17:49  Jochen Striepe
+
+       * t-prot: Many fixes to many regexes, fixing performance issues und
+       readability.  Some were entirely replaced by faster means.
+
 2005-04-25 16:35  Jochen Striepe
 
        * t-prot: Release as v1.101.