X-Git-Url: https://git.deb.at/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=TODO;h=95a3130524c9dcaf528046d6086bae4dc6542e0f;hb=49f6fa5b401d8bba7abc2bafde675841a8729a15;hp=ca72c4963ccdfb53723f7e2991c59b47801ee6e2;hpb=08721b8e6f4a348804799627d44ca4902e47921d;p=deb%2Fpackages.git diff --git a/TODO b/TODO index ca72c49..95a3130 100644 --- a/TODO +++ b/TODO @@ -23,12 +23,43 @@ search_packages.pl: - Better exact=1 performance by indexing per word? - drop case-sensitive from options, descriptions.txt all lowercase and without punctuation, such that instead of =~ //, indexof can be used + - in results, show full descriptions, so one sees what's being matched? - backend: - Ensure that in _small.db, newest version for each suite is first, show_package relies on that. So foreach suite, 'newest entry', and only then, all the other entries +Static pages: +- with this design, we can resolve experimental dependencies from unstable +- try to make it faster + General: - Try to break everything with empty/short searches - Check for case sensitive consistency +- Fix assumption that archive doesn't show up in any url, consistency-fy + dealing with archives of a different set than (us, non-us, security) +- Some packages are both concrete and virtual, deal with that: in depends + display of show_package (now if a package is concrete, you only see that), + and eh, somewhere else too ttbomk +- grep -ri fixme +- searchon=all -> searchon=descriptions? +- quicksearch box: copy parameters of current search (exact,suite,arch,etc), + or rather, always use defaults? Both have their pro&cons... former is more + obscure, but otoh, for typo fixing more appropriate. + Maybe best of both worlds is 'modify search' below results, where you can + generalize/specificy arch, etc etc? + + +Bugs: +- amd64 security is getting displayed weirdly +- kfreebsd-i386 contents files have no header and aren't read correctly + currently + +Missing pieces from old code: + - newpkg + - mail stuff + - DDTP support (but without a working DDTP I will not invest any time + in that) + - search_packages compatibility (we should at least ensure we don't break + sarge's reportbug)